Agentic Web CensusCheck your site
EN

Technologies · September 2026

Which Video players is readiest for AI agents?

10 measured, averaging 13.1% against 21.0% for the web overall. Tools that embed videos on websites

Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
VideoJS

VideoJS

Sample
n=2,256
Coverage
96.7%
Margin
±1.12
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.12 are tied, not ranked.

VideoJS scores 20.9%20.9%
VideoJS: 5 months, no significant change= +0.6
Wistia

Wistia

Sample
n=157
Coverage
98.1%
Margin
±4.23
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.23 are tied, not ranked.

Wistia scores 17.5%17.5%
Wistia: 5 months, no significant change= −3.5
Vimeo

Vimeo

Sample
n=3,060
Coverage
96.7%
Margin
±0.96
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±0.96 are tied, not ranked.

Vimeo scores 16.9%16.9%
Vimeo: 5 months, no significant change= −0.7
Plyr

Plyr

Sample
n=811
Coverage
96.5%
Margin
±1.86
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.86 are tied, not ranked.

Plyr scores 15.6%15.6%
Plyr: 5 months, no significant change= +0.6
YouTube

YouTube

Sample
n=10,531
Coverage
95.0%
Margin
±0.52
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±0.52 are tied, not ranked.

YouTube scores 15.0%15.0%
YouTube: 5 months, up▲ +2.0
Twitch Player

Twitch Player

Sample
n=206
Coverage
97.6%
Margin
±3.69
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.69 are tied, not ranked.

Twitch Player scores 13.5%13.5%
Twitch Player: 5 months, no significant change= −0.1
MediaElement.js

MediaElement.js

Sample
n=3,520
Coverage
95.5%
Margin
±0.89
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±0.89 are tied, not ranked.

MediaElement.js scores 11.5%11.5%
MediaElement.js: 5 months, no significant change= −0.1
jPlayer

jPlayer

Sample
n=131
Coverage
95.6%
Margin
±4.63
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.63 are tied, not ranked.

jPlayer scores 8.3%8.3%
jPlayer: 5 months, no significant change= +1.0
JW Player

JW Player

Sample
n=136
Coverage
97.8%
Margin
±4.54
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.54 are tied, not ranked.

JW Player scores 6.1%6.1%
JW Player: 5 months, no significant change= −2.3
Flowplayer

Flowplayer

Sample
n=100
Coverage
97.1%
Margin
±5.30
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±5.30 are tied, not ranked.

Flowplayer scores 5.8%5.8%
—