Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Elastic APM

Elastic APM

Sample
n=166
Coverage
98.8%
Margin
±4.11
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.11 are tied, not ranked.

Elastic APM scores 43.3%43.3%
Elastic APM: 3 months, up▲ +20.2
Datadog

Datadog

Sample
n=1,553
Coverage
98.4%
Margin
±1.34
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.34 are tied, not ranked.

Datadog scores 31.9%31.9%
Datadog: 5 months, no significant change= −0.9
Boomerang

Boomerang

Sample
n=300
Coverage
88.8%
Margin
±3.06
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.06 are tied, not ranked.

Boomerang scores 21.1%21.1%
Boomerang: 5 months, no significant change= +3.2
Cloudflare Browser Insights

Cloudflare Browser Insights

Sample
n=19,515
Coverage
96.9%
Margin
±0.38
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±0.38 are tied, not ranked.

Cloudflare Browser Insights scores 20.7%20.7%
Cloudflare Browser Insights: 5 months, down▼ −1.5
Microsoft Application Insights

Microsoft Application Insights

Sample
n=166
Coverage
98.8%
Margin
±4.11
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.11 are tied, not ranked.

Microsoft Application Insights scores 20.7%20.7%
Microsoft Application Insights: 5 months, no significant change= +3.5
Akamai mPulse

Akamai mPulse

Sample
n=271
Coverage
88.0%
Margin
±3.22
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.22 are tied, not ranked.

Akamai mPulse scores 19.1%19.1%
Akamai mPulse: 5 months, no significant change= +3.3
web-vitals

web-vitals

Sample
n=516
Coverage
93.0%
Margin
±2.33
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.33 are tied, not ranked.

web-vitals scores 18.6%18.6%
web-vitals: 5 months, no significant change= +0.8
New Relic

New Relic

Sample
n=1,332
Coverage
97.0%
Margin
±1.45
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.45 are tied, not ranked.

New Relic scores 15.8%15.8%
New Relic: 5 months, no significant change= +1.4