Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Criteo

Criteo

Sample
n=1,144
Coverage
83.6%
Margin
±1.57
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.57 are tied, not ranked.

Criteo scores 26.7%26.7%
Criteo: 5 months, up▲ +2.6
AdRoll

AdRoll

Sample
n=282
Coverage
98.6%
Margin
±3.16
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.16 are tied, not ranked.

AdRoll scores 22.8%22.8%
AdRoll: 5 months, no significant change= +0.7
Yahoo Advertising

Yahoo Advertising

Sample
n=348
Coverage
97.5%
Margin
±2.84
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.84 are tied, not ranked.

Yahoo Advertising scores 9.3%9.3%
Yahoo Advertising: 5 months, no significant change= +1.3