Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Application Request Routing

Application Request Routing

Sample
n=113
Coverage
97.4%
Margin
±4.99
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.99 are tied, not ranked.

Application Request Routing scores 20.6%20.6%
Application Request Routing: 4 months, up▲ +7.7
Amazon ALB

Amazon ALB

Sample
n=2,775
Coverage
92.3%
Margin
±1.01
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.01 are tied, not ranked.

Amazon ALB scores 19.9%19.9%
Amazon ALB: 5 months, no significant change= +0.8
Azure Front Door

Azure Front Door

Sample
n=411
Coverage
96.5%
Margin
±2.61
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.61 are tied, not ranked.

Azure Front Door scores 16.8%16.8%
Azure Front Door: 5 months, no significant change= +1.9