Agentic Web CensusCheck your site
EN

Technologies · September 2026

Which LMS is readiest for AI agents?

3 measured, averaging 20.1% against 21.0% for the web overall. Platforms used to create, manage, and deliver online courses

Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Skolengo

Skolengo

Sample
n=265
Coverage
97.4%
Margin
±3.26
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.26 are tied, not ranked.

Skolengo scores 31.6%31.6%
Skolengo: 5 months, no significant change= −1.5
Moodle

Moodle

Sample
n=124
Coverage
96.1%
Margin
±4.76
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.76 are tied, not ranked.

Moodle scores 17.1%17.1%
Moodle: 4 months, no significant change= −3.8
LearnDash

LearnDash

Sample
n=106
Coverage
97.3%
Margin
±5.15
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±5.15 are tied, not ranked.

LearnDash scores 11.6%11.6%
LearnDash: 4 months, no significant change= +1.3