Agentic Web CensusCheck your site
EN

Technologies · September 2026

Which JavaScript graphics is readiest for AI agents?

9 measured, averaging 14.8% against 21.0% for the web overall. Libraries used to create visual elements on websites

Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
MathJax

MathJax

Sample
n=235
Coverage
95.1%
Margin
±3.46
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.46 are tied, not ranked.

MathJax scores 23.0%23.0%
MathJax: 5 months, no significant change= +1.6
Three.js

Three.js

Sample
n=559
Coverage
92.9%
Margin
±2.24
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.24 are tied, not ranked.

Three.js scores 18.0%18.0%
Three.js: 5 months, no significant change= +1.1
Highcharts

Highcharts

Sample
n=142
Coverage
87.1%
Margin
±4.45
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.45 are tied, not ranked.

Highcharts scores 16.1%16.1%
Highcharts: 5 months, up▲ +7.8
ApexCharts.js

ApexCharts.js

Sample
n=170
Coverage
85.9%
Margin
±4.06
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.06 are tied, not ranked.

ApexCharts.js scores 15.2%15.2%
ApexCharts.js: 5 months, no significant change= −2.1
D3

D3

Sample
n=192
Coverage
90.1%
Margin
±3.82
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.82 are tied, not ranked.

D3 scores 12.9%12.9%
D3: 5 months, no significant change= +1.3
particles.js

particles.js

Sample
n=1,185
Coverage
90.3%
Margin
±1.54
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.54 are tied, not ranked.

particles.js scores 12.6%12.6%
particles.js: 5 months, up▲ +2.1
Chart.js

Chart.js

Sample
n=1,769
Coverage
92.5%
Margin
±1.26
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.26 are tied, not ranked.

Chart.js scores 12.4%12.4%
Chart.js: 5 months, no significant change= +0.6
anime.js

anime.js

Sample
n=1,577
Coverage
94.7%
Margin
±1.33
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.33 are tied, not ranked.

anime.js scores 11.9%11.9%
anime.js: 5 months, no significant change= −0.7
Raphael

Raphael

Sample
n=238
Coverage
93.7%
Margin
±3.44
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±3.44 are tied, not ranked.

Raphael scores 11.6%11.6%
Raphael: 5 months, no significant change= +3.2