Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
Calendly

Calendly

Sample
n=544
Coverage
95.4%
Margin
±2.27
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.27 are tied, not ranked.

Calendly scores 18.4%18.4%
Calendly: 5 months, no significant change= +1.4
FareHarbor

FareHarbor

Sample
n=121
Coverage
97.6%
Margin
±4.82
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±4.82 are tied, not ranked.

FareHarbor scores 17.9%17.9%
FareHarbor: 4 months, no significant change= +2.4