Every one of them, best first

How to read these figures

The colour says what a bar IS, not how it scores: the accent is the one this page is about, grey is everything it is compared with, and the hollow bar is the web overall — the ruler, not a rival. Whether a figure is above or below the rest of the web is in the number and in the arrow beside it.

Every figure here comes from a sample, not from counting every site — so it carries a margin: how much it could move if we had happened to sample different pages. A figure measured on a thousand pages has a wide margin; one measured on a hundred thousand has a narrow one. It matters for one thing: two figures that differ by less than the wider of their margins are not one above the other, they are tied. That is why nothing here has a position number.

Every technology in this category the census can publish a figure for, including the ones above. A technology is here when it has all four dimensions and enough sample to publish; a technology that belongs to two categories is in both.

TechnologyAWCSMonth by month
UserWay

UserWay

Sample
n=1,116
Coverage
98.2%
Margin
±1.59
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±1.59 are tied, not ranked.

UserWay scores 23.2%23.2%
UserWay: 5 months, no significant change= −0.6
AccessiBe

AccessiBe

Sample
n=517
Coverage
98.9%
Margin
±2.33
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.33 are tied, not ranked.

AccessiBe scores 21.3%21.3%
AccessiBe: 5 months, no significant change= −2.3
AudioEye

AudioEye

Sample
n=514
Coverage
98.9%
Margin
±2.34
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.34 are tied, not ranked.

AudioEye scores 20.2%20.2%
AudioEye: 5 months, no significant change= +0.2
Pojo.me

Pojo.me

Sample
n=440
Coverage
96.1%
Margin
±2.53
The web overall
21.0%

Two figures closer together than ±2.53 are tied, not ranked.

Pojo.me scores 4.4%4.4%
Pojo.me: 5 months, no significant change= +0.6